Behavioral Health Accreditation Standards Prior to beginning work on this discussion review the 2007 Guide to September 2023

Behavioral Health Accreditation Standards Prior to beginning work on this discussion review the 2007 Guide to 2023

Behavioral Health Accreditation Standards

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, review the 2007 Guide to Joint Commission Behavioral Health Care Accreditation (Links to an external site.) pdf. You will see that there are categories of areas that the organization looks at that are listed in this document. For example, in previous years, these categories have been: Quality Management and Improvement (QI), Coordination of Care (CC), Utilization Management (UM), Credentialing and Recredentialing (CR), and Members’ Rights and Responsibilities (RR). For your discussion, please pick one item from each of the updated standards listed in the linked document that you think is the most important item in that category, and briefly explain why you feel that it is so important. As you do this, consider what a consumer of your services might think about accreditation — does it make a difference to your consumers?

When you discuss the outcomes, refer to any specific standards that you may be currently using or considering. Feel free to add relevant examples, share relevant resources you have found (articles, videos, podcasts, infographics, quotes), share your relevant personal observations or experiences, and/or offer a short scenario as a realistic application of the concept.

When responding to your peers’ original postings, review the outcomes they selected and elaborate upon them by commenting on how their approach is similar/dissimilar from yours.

Please provide an initial substantive answer 400 words in length. 

Resources

Required References

The Joint Commission. (2007). 2007 Guide to Joint Commission behavioral health care accreditation. Retrieved from https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/BHC_Toolkit.pdf (Links to an external site.)

Willging, C., Sommerfeld, D., Aarons, G., & Waitzkin, H. (2014). The effects of behavioral health reform on safety-net institutions: A mixed-method assessment in a rural state. Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Services Research, 41(2), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-012-0465-1

World Health Organization. (2003). Quality improvement for mental health. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/resources/en/Quality.pdf (Links to an external site.)
Pgs. 32 – 53

Recommended References

Al-Sughayir, M. A. (2016). Effect of accreditation on length of stay in psychiatric inpatients: Pre-post accreditation medical record comparison. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 10, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-016-0090-6

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

APA Practice Organization. (n.d.) Legal issues. Retrieved from http://www.apapracticecentral.org/legal/index.aspx (Links to an external site.)

CARF Behavioral Health. (2016). Providers. Retrieved from http://www.carf.org/providers.aspx?Content=Content/Accreditation/Opportunities/BH/toc.htm (Links to an external site.)

The Joint Commission. (n.d.). Joint Commission FAQ page. Retrieved from https://www.jointcommission.org/about/jointcommissionfaqs.aspx?CategoryId=14 (Links to an external site.)

The Joint Commission. (n.d.) Standards interpretation. Retrieved from https://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/jcfaq.aspx?ProgramId=4&ChapterId=0&IsFeatured=False&IsNew=False&Keyword= (Links to an external site.)

Lee, M. Y. (2014). Motivations to pursue accreditation in children’s mental health care: A Multiple case study. Nonprofit Management And Leadership, 24(3), 399-415.

Shallcross, L. (Ed.). (2012). What the future holds for the counseling profession. Retrieved from http://ct.counseling.org/2012/03/what-the-future-holds-for-the-counseling-profession/ (Links to an external site.)

Smucker, B. (1999). The non-profit lobbying guide (2nd ed.). Independent Sector: Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://conservationtools-production.s3.amazonaws.com/library_item_files/1102/1009/nonprofitlobbyingguide.pdf

 

Essayanswers.org Assignment Help Provider

We have a team of Assignment experts who are the leading assignment help providers in the worldwide platform. We have university assignment expert who help the students in the best possible manner. At Google, there are many service providers as well that might not be reliable and do not guarantee money-back. But our assignment help service company is legal and reliable and provides plagiarism-free work without any cheating. Each company has its formats of submitting the assignments and placing the order. The assignment's subject, topic, and deadline need to be provided to the service providers. Based on the following documents, the price is quoted and approved. The experts are often called academic writers who all possess extensive knowledge and experts in the field. The services of academic writings include custom help in essay writing, term paper, coursework, homework assignments, research writings, dissertation, and many more.

Step-by-step solutions. Top grades guaranteed.